Whatever religion you believe, suicide is not an option. He is a deceiver using the romantic story of Romeo & Juliet to win her soul over to commit suicide. This devil/reaper/vampire type/spirit appeared just when she had another bad night. He was already in the land of the dead or undead.whatever you want to call it. They began to fly and SHE HAD BECOME LIKE THEY ARE. saying don't be afraid,Īnd she ran to him. Then the door was open and the wind appeared, She contemplated suicide before, but felt she couldn't go on any longer. Could be anything to put you her in a bad way. This is coaxing."come on baby, take my hand, don't fear, we'll fly, I'm your man" They committed suicide, so this song does indeed promote suicide.īaby, take my hand. She had taken his hand (she had become like they are)Īre together in eternity. They looked backward and said goodbye (she had become like they are) Then the door was open and the wind appearedĪnd she ran to him (then they started to fly) We'll be able to fly (don't fear the reaper)Īre together in eternity (Romeo and Juliet)Ĥ0,000 men and women everyday (like Romeo and Juliet)Ĥ0,000 men and women everyday (redefine happiness)Īnother 40,000 coming everyday (we can be like they are) It will also recommend moving away from the efficiency narrative to consider larger issues in enforcement (which are not so easily solved) such as human rights and rule of law issues, and more emphasis on trouble-shooting problems before they become major scandals.Baby, take my hand (don't fear the reaper) This should be publicly accessible and would contain anonymised case-studies to help users understand what is and is not acceptable. For example, the Facebook Files leak featured multiple slides prohibiting any positive statements about the Irish Republican Army (the IRA) but no accompanying slides indicating that the same treatment should be applied to other para-military groups from Northern Ireland.įinally, it will provide a number of suggestions for reform such as the adoption of a body of precedents as a tool for accountability and empowerment of users. The paper will move on to investigate the inconsistent enforcement of terms and conditions, which increases user uncertainty and raises concerns that some narratives are being privileged over others.
For example, platforms often fixate on how fast content can be removed after it is posted, a narrative that this paper will argue has also influenced political discussions around social media. Then the paper will examine over-reliance on efficiency as a solution, where platforms respond to controversies by offering solutions that promise enhanced speed or technical effectiveness without addressing the underlying issues. This differential treatment stems from the rules created by a male-dominated Silicon Valley, which embodies a particular form of cultural bias. This paper will use the example of blood and how menstrual blood is treated by platforms as infinitely more objectionable than blood resulting from graphic violence or serious accidents (despite it being a normal aspect of women’s health). It will consider bias in decision-making, a problem that exists for both human and algorithmic moderators. The investigation will then turn to the enforcement process itself and identify a number of problems in how content rules are generally enforced. This paper will first explain what the role of the moderator entails and how the enforcement process occurs at social media platforms. This will be a central theme throughout the paper as it is a troubling situation despite laws like the Network Enforcement Act in Germany and decisions such as Google Spain requiring platforms to take on an increasing number of legal assessments.
FEAR THE REAPER FREE
The enforcement stage is also where the concerns over private companies regulating the exercise of free expression online are at their more pronounced. The enforcement stage is arguably the most important stage in the moderation process because it has the most impact on what content is available and how the platform is governed. It argues that the current approach adopted by most platforms is underdeveloped, poses serious human rights issues, and would benefit from a number of reforms. This paper investigates the enforcement stage of the content moderation process on social media platforms.
0 kommentar(er)
